The method
Scan · Classify · Preserve · Map · Escalate
Civic Shield is a research and evidence organisation, and the record is the thing it produces. Five stages, one artefact, and a ceiling stated in the same breath as the capability — the escalation ladder at the end is what a record of that quality makes possible, not the promise this page opens with. Nothing described here has been run in production; this is the design Civic Shield is asking to be funded to build.
Stage 01
Scan — public sources, read only
Websites, blogs, public forums, newsletters, podcasts and video pages: material that is published in order to be found, read in the languages it is actually written in.
No private groups. No closed communities. No direct messages. Nothing that requires being let in.
Where collection is automated, it reads public material and does nothing else: it never posts, never replies, never engages, never brigades, never mass-reports, and never enters private spaces or closed groups. Research collection accounts exist so that public material can be read in a stable, repeatable way — not so that anything can be said with them. Nothing they do can alter what is being read.
Stage 02
Classify — categories, not verdicts about people
Each item is assessed against a defined taxonomy and returned with a category, a severity, a confidence value and the specific passages that support the reading. Model confidence and reviewer confidence are recorded separately, because they are different claims about different things.
The output is never “this person is antisemitic.” It is: this content, at this address, on this date, appears to meet this definition and to engage this rule, for these stated reasons.
Stage 03
Preserve — a record built to survive examination
Not a screenshot in a chat. A structured record built to an evidentiary standard: assembled so that someone who would prefer it fell apart can examine it and find that it does not.
Anatomy of an evidence package
Evidence record · schema draft v0.1
Illustrative record · constructed · not a real case- Capture URI [1]
- hxxps://[REDACTED].invalid/artikel/2026-03-14/[REDACTED]
- Captured (UTC) [2]
- · HTTP 200
- Method [3]
- Full-page render · DOM snapshot retained · no raw archive of the wider site
- Extracted text [4]
- Redacted. No captured content is reproduced on this site.
- Translation [5]
- Redacted. DE → EN · machine draft · human review pending
- SHA-256 [6]
e6c2ffab9c21059d…56ec0ee2- Policy match [7]
- ILLUSTRATIVE-POLICY §3.2(a) · version in force on 2026-03-14 · effective 2026-01-08
- Severity / confidence [8]
- Severity 3 / 5 · model confidence 0.87 · reviewer confidence not yet recorded
- Chain of custody [9]
-
2026-03-14T09:42:17Z captured · system v0.1
2026-03-14T10:15:40Z classified · model tag illustrative-70b
2026-03-14T11:02:04Z queued for human decision · not yet reviewed
What each field is for
- Capture URI. The exact address the material was read from, stored in full. The public rendering is redacted; the vault copy is not.
- Captured (UTC). The moment of capture and the response the server gave, in a single timezone, so two records from two countries can be compared.
- Method. How the page was rendered and what was retained. Raw archives of whole sites are not kept; the record is the unit, not the crawl.
- Extracted text. The readable text of the page, including text inside images. Material placed in a picture to escape a text filter does not escape this.
- Translation. Attached, never substituted, and carrying its own confidence value. The original language is the record; the translation is an aid to reading it.
- SHA-256. A digest computed over the preserved bundle. It does not protect the content. It proves the content has not changed since the moment it was sealed — which is why the button above recomputes it in front of you rather than asserting it.
- Policy match. The specific rule engaged, recorded together with the version of that rule in force on the date of capture. Rules change; records should not have to.
- Severity and confidence. Two separate scores, never merged. A severe item read with low confidence is not the same object as a mild item read with high confidence, and treating them alike is how monitoring systems lose their credibility.
- Chain of custody. An append-only log of every action taken on the record — capture, review, decision, escalation — with the person and the system version responsible for each. Nothing can be quietly amended. Nothing can be silently deleted.
Stage 04
Map — one page is an incident
Preserved records are the beginning. Held together, they show what a single report can never show: which sites recycle each other, which text reappears in four languages, which domains keep resurfacing under new names, and which of them are being paid.
That is the difference between reporting a page and being able to describe the thing the page belongs to.
Stage 05
Escalate — the ladder, and where it stops
This stage is last because it is a consequence, not a purpose. Civic Shield is built to produce evidence; enforcement is what evidence of that quality lets other people do, and the people entitled to do it are platforms, regulators, service providers and lawyers — not us.
The ladder below describes what a completed record makes possible. None of it has been exercised: no notice has been sent, no regulator contacted, no case file produced. If the record is not good enough to stand on its own, nothing on this ladder is available at all.
-
Notice to the platform or the publisher
A properly formed notice citing the specific rule, the preserved record, and the version of the policy in force on the day.
-
Regulatory escalation
Where a European route exists, a complaint that arrives already documented rather than as an allegation to be investigated from scratch.
-
The infrastructure behind the page
Hosting providers, domain registrars, advertising networks and payment services each have their own terms. A page can breach several of them at once.
-
Support for legal action
Case files prepared to a standard a lawyer can work from — assembled for people who are qualified to decide what to do with them.
Next step
The method is the thing worth attacking.
Funders, partners, researchers and lawyers are welcome to take this apart before any money changes hands. The due-diligence pack contains the governance documentation, the safeguards and the parts that are still unresolved.